<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wizz RSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za</link>
	<description>Wizz RSS News Reader for Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:20:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0 maxVersion bumped to 6.0.*</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/08/18/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0-maxversion-bumped-to-6-0/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/08/18/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0-maxversion-bumped-to-6-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who have upgraded to Firefox 6.0, I have bumped maxVersion, in Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0, to 6.0.n, and it seems to work. I haven&#8217;t done any comprehensive testing, but I&#8217;m using it myself and I haven&#8217;t spotted any major weirdness yet. If you want to install Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0 on Firefox 6.0, you can do so by clicking this link: &#8211; http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi If you have “purchased” a nag free version of Wizz RSS, by making a donation, you can get the nag free version here http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who have upgraded to Firefox 6.0, I have bumped maxVersion, in Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0, to 6.0.n, and it <strong>seems</strong> to work. I haven&#8217;t done any comprehensive testing, but I&#8217;m using it myself and I haven&#8217;t spotted any major weirdness <strong>yet</strong>.</p>
<p>If you want to install Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0 on Firefox 6.0, you can do so by clicking this link: &#8211; <a href="http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi">http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi</a></p>
<p>If you have “purchased” a nag free version of Wizz RSS, by making a donation, you can get the nag free version here <a href="http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php">http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/08/18/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0-maxversion-bumped-to-6-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0 maxVersion bumped to 5.0.*</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/06/21/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0-maxversion-bumped-to-5-0/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/06/21/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0-maxversion-bumped-to-5-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are one of those who desperately wants (or needs) Wizz RSS to work on Firefox 5.0, please just reinstall 4.0.1.0, and it should work. WARNING: I have done very superficial testing of 4.0.1.0 on Firefox 5.0 (I installed 5.0b7, but it updated itself, and now I have no idea what version I actually tested with, because Mozilla, in their infinite wisdom, only show 5.0 on the about Firefox page. Idiots!), and everything seems to work. If 4.0.1.0 breaks your Firefox, please don&#8217;t complain to me! BUGS: If you find any, please let me know, so that I can try to fix them. If you have already installed Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0, just reinstall it from here http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi If you have “purchased” a nag free version of Wizz RSS, you can get the nag free version here http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php &#60;edit&#62; Errrrmmmmm&#8230; Okay, I&#8217;m a bit slow. I didn&#8217;t realize the FF 5.0 final had been released today (21/06) &#8211; Sheepish grin. So when I installed 5.0b7, hopefully it actually updated itself to 5.0 final. My apologies to the Mozilla idiots for calling them idiots &#60;/edit&#62;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are one of those who desperately wants (or needs) Wizz RSS to work on Firefox 5.0, please just reinstall 4.0.1.0, and it should work.</p>
<p><strong>WARNING</strong>: I have done <strong>very</strong> superficial testing of 4.0.1.0 on Firefox 5.0 (I installed 5.0b7, but it updated itself, and now I have no idea what version I actually tested with, because Mozilla, in their infinite wisdom, only show 5.0 on the about Firefox page. Idiots!), and everything <strong>seems</strong> to work. If 4.0.1.0 breaks your Firefox, please don&#8217;t complain to me!</p>
<p><strong>BUGS</strong>: If you find any, please let me know, so that I can try to fix them.</p>
<p>If you have already installed Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0, just reinstall it from here <a href="http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi">http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi</a></p>
<p>If you have “purchased” a nag free version of Wizz RSS, you can get the nag free version here <a href="http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php">http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php</a></p>
<p>&lt;edit&gt;<br />
Errrrmmmmm&#8230; Okay, I&#8217;m a bit slow. I didn&#8217;t realize the FF 5.0 final had been released today (21/06) &#8211; Sheepish grin. So when I installed 5.0b7, hopefully it actually updated itself to 5.0 final. My apologies to the Mozilla idiots for calling them idiots <img src='http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&lt;/edit&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/06/21/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0-maxversion-bumped-to-5-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/06/18/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/06/18/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were quite a few bugs in Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0, which I&#8217;ve been meaning to fix for ages. Well, I finally got around to fixing them. I hope I&#8217;ve fixed all of them. If not, please let me know which ones I missed, so I can get onto them. Firstly, the context menu bug has been fixed. This bug was causing the usual Firefox context menu (the Firefox menu that usually pops up when right clicking on a page) to not display, after having right clicked on the Wizz RSS sidebar. Secondly, the bug that was causing feeds and/or folders to not be deleted, when selecting delete from the context menu, has been fixed. Lastly, the bug that was causing nothing to be restored from the Wizz RSS server, when selecting to overwrite existing data, has been fixed. You can get Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0 here. If you have &#8220;purchased&#8221; a nag free version of Wizz RSS, you can get the nag free version here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were quite a few bugs in Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0, which I&#8217;ve been meaning to fix for ages. Well, I finally got around to fixing them. I hope I&#8217;ve fixed all of them. If not, please let me know which ones I missed, so I can get onto them.</p>
<p>Firstly, the context menu bug has been fixed. This bug was causing the usual Firefox context menu (the Firefox menu that usually pops up when right clicking on a page) to not display, after having right clicked on the Wizz RSS sidebar.</p>
<p>Secondly, the bug that was causing feeds and/or folders to not be deleted, when selecting delete from the context menu, has been fixed.</p>
<p>Lastly, the bug that was causing nothing to be restored from the Wizz RSS server, when selecting to overwrite existing data, has been fixed.</p>
<p>You can get Wizz RSS 4.0.1.0 <a href="http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4010.xpi">here</a>.</p>
<p>If you have &#8220;purchased&#8221; a nag free version of Wizz RSS, you can get the nag free version <a href="http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/06/18/wizz-rss-4-0-1-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The feed publication interface has been fixed</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/05/26/the-feed-publication-interface-has-been-fixed/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/05/26/the-feed-publication-interface-has-been-fixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 11:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few people have complained about the feed publication interface not working (it may have been the same person that complained a few times ), so I decided to have a look at it today. Yes, the page that generates HTML wasn&#8217;t working, mainly because stupid (Moi!) still had old ASP type tags stuck in his PHP code. So that was an easy fix. I also noticed that feeds weren&#8217;t being parsed by with Wizz RSS server. This one took a little longer to fix, but it also seems to be working now. If you&#8217;ve been having trouble getting the feed publication interface to work, it should all be working now (I hope). You can see a working example here: &#8211; http://www.wizzrss.com/PublishNew.php]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few people have complained about the <a href="http://www.wizzrss.com/PublishNew.php">feed publication interface</a> not working (it may have been the same person that complained a few times <img src='http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), so I decided to have a look at it today. Yes, the page that generates HTML wasn&#8217;t working, mainly because stupid (Moi!) still had old ASP type tags stuck in his PHP code. So that was an easy fix. I also noticed that feeds weren&#8217;t being parsed by with Wizz RSS server. This one took a little longer to fix, but it also seems to be working now.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve been having trouble getting the feed publication interface to work, it should all be working now (I hope). You can see a working example here: &#8211; <a href= "http://www.wizzrss.com/PublishNew.php">http://www.wizzrss.com/PublishNew.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/05/26/the-feed-publication-interface-has-been-fixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS is now on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/05/02/wizz-rss-is-now-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/05/02/wizz-rss-is-now-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 06:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who are interested, Wizz RSS is now on Twitter &#8211; http://twitter.com/Wizz_RSS Twitter might be a better mechanism for reporting bugs, and keeping up to date with various happenings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are interested, Wizz RSS is now on Twitter &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/Wizz_RSS">http://twitter.com/Wizz_RSS</a></p>
<p>Twitter might be a better mechanism for reporting bugs, and keeping up to date with various happenings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/05/02/wizz-rss-is-now-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At long last nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() has been fixed!</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/03/28/at-long-last-nsiscriptableunescapehtmlparsefragment-has-been-fixed/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/03/28/at-long-last-nsiscriptableunescapehtmlparsefragment-has-been-fixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/03/28/at-long-last-nsiscriptableunescapehtmlparsefragment-has-been-fixed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 17 November 2009 I blogged about vulnerabilities with nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() here &#8211; So much for nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment(). At the time, nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() was being recommended by Wladimir Palant, Jorge Villalobos, and others, as the only way to display web content, within the trusted chrome context, while eliminating all potential security issues. Yeah right! Not only were Wladimir Palant and Jorge Villalobos &#8220;selling&#8221; nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() as the cure-all for potential security issues with displaying web content within the chrome context, but Jorge Villalobos even went as far as making this comment in Bugzilla: - After reviewing these comments and the extension code, it is clear to me that the current effort to secure the add-on is misguided. You can’t just rely on ’sanitizing’ input and expect it to be “safe enough”, specially when there are clearly safer alternatives. I have sandboxed all versions of Wizz RSS News Reader except the latest one, and all versions of Reader Lite, including the latest. Its trusted status has been revoked as well. Mike, you have 2 weeks to correct your extension code to make it safe. You should upload the update on AMO and let us know so that we can review it. If you don’t comply [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 17 November 2009 I blogged about vulnerabilities with nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() here &#8211; <a href="http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2009/11/17/so-much-for-nsiscriptableunescapehtmlparsefragment/">So much for nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment()</a>. At the time, nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() was being recommended by Wladimir Palant, Jorge Villalobos, and others, as the only way to display web content, within the trusted chrome context, while eliminating all potential security issues. Yeah right!</p>
<p>Not only were Wladimir Palant and Jorge Villalobos &#8220;selling&#8221; nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() as the cure-all for potential security issues with displaying web content within the chrome context, but Jorge Villalobos even went as far as making this comment in Bugzilla: -</p>
<blockquote><p>After reviewing these comments and the extension code, it is clear to me that the current effort to secure the add-on is misguided. You can’t just rely on ’sanitizing’ input and expect it to be “safe enough”, specially when there are clearly safer alternatives.</p>
<p>I have sandboxed all versions of Wizz RSS News Reader except the latest one, and all versions of Reader Lite, including the latest. Its trusted status has been revoked as well.</p>
<p>Mike, you have 2 weeks to correct your extension code to make it safe. You should upload the update on AMO and let us know so that we can review it. If you don’t comply by then, your latest version will be sandboxed as well. I also recommend you read our latest add-on policies (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/policies/) and make sure you<br />
comply with all of them. For example, your current version doesn’t follow our namespacing guidelines, which makes your add-on a likely cause of compatibility problems.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to Roberto Suggi Liverani, who posted this link today &#8211; <a href="http://malerisch.net/articles/ParanoidFragmentSink_and_a_confusing_disclosure.html">http://malerisch.net/articles/ParanoidFragmentSink_and_a_confusing_disclosure.html</a> &#8211; it is now quite clear that my efforts <strong>were not</strong> misguided, and clearly Jorge&#8217;s &#8220;safer alternatives&#8221; weren&#8217;t safe at all!</p>
<p>Anyway, regardless of the stupidity of the little boys at Mozilla, nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() has been fixed. It only took 16 months!</p>
<p>Wizz RSS hooks into nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment() for sanitizing web content. So, if you use a version of Firefox that includes the fixed version of nsIScriptableUnescapeHTML.parseFragment(), you&#8217;ll now be safe. Hmmmm&#8230; Well&#8230; Safer. It is pretty obvious that the self acclaimed &#8220;security experts&#8221; at Mozilla can&#8217;t be trusted, so we&#8217;ll just hope and pray that this time they actually got it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/03/28/at-long-last-nsiscriptableunescapehtmlparsefragment-has-been-fixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0 for Firefox 4.0.n is available</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/01/08/wizz-rss-4000-for-firefox-40n-is-available/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/01/08/wizz-rss-4000-for-firefox-40n-is-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/01/08/wizz-rss-4000-for-firefox-40n-is-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you to those (very few) people who took the time to beta test Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0. The issues that were reported have been fixed, and the bug with the scroll bar in the item pane (A Firefox bug &#8211; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584703) also seems to have been fixed. I have set maxVersion of Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0 to 4.0.*, which means that it should work with Firefox 4.0b8, and it should continue to work with all future releases of Firefox 4, including the production release, whenever that might happen. You can get Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0 here http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4000.xpi or here http://www.wizzrss.com/XPIs/wizzrss4000.xpi If you happen to find any bugs with 4.0.0.0, please report them, so that they can get fixed. If you &#8220;bought&#8221; a &#8220;nag free version&#8221; of Wizz RSS, by making a donation, you can update your &#8220;nag free version&#8221; here http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php &#8211; You DO NOT have to make another donation!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you to those (very few) people who took the time to beta test Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0. The issues that were reported have been fixed, and the bug with the scroll bar in the item pane (A Firefox bug &#8211; <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584703">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584703</a>) also seems to have been fixed.</p>
<p>I have set maxVersion of Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0 to 4.0.*, which means that it should work with Firefox 4.0b8, and it should continue to work with all future releases of Firefox 4, including the production release, whenever that might happen.</p>
<p>You can get Wizz RSS 4.0.0.0 here <a href="http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4000.xpi">http://blat.co.za/XPIs/wizzrss4000.xpi</a> or here <a href="http://www.wizzrss.com/XPIs/wizzrss4000.xpi">http://www.wizzrss.com/XPIs/wizzrss4000.xpi</a></p>
<p>If you happen to find any bugs with 4.0.0.0, <strong>please</strong> report them, so that they can get fixed.</p>
<p>If you &#8220;bought&#8221; a &#8220;nag free version&#8221; of Wizz RSS, by making a donation, you can update your &#8220;nag free version&#8221; here <a href="http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php">http://www.wizzrss.com/dlnn.php</a> &#8211; <strong>You DO NOT have to make another donation!</strong> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2011/01/08/wizz-rss-4000-for-firefox-40n-is-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incompatibility with Tab Mix Plus 0.3.8.5pre.100907a</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/09/incompatibility-with-tab-mix-plus-0385pre100907a/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/09/incompatibility-with-tab-mix-plus-0385pre100907a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/09/incompatibility-with-tab-mix-plus-0385pre100907a/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Eric, who today made me aware of a problem when using Wizz RSS and Tab Mix Plus &#8211; http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/#comments. If you are one of those who use Tab Mix Plus and Wizz RSS, don&#8217;t worry, you haven&#8217;t gone crazy There is some pretty serious weirdness when both add-ons are enabled. Eric reported the problem in the Tab Mix Plus support forum, and onemen (one of the Tab Mix Plus developers I assume) has undertaken to sort out the problem on the Tab Mix Plus side. Thanks onemen!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Eric, who today made me aware of a problem when using Wizz RSS and Tab Mix Plus &#8211; <a href="http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/#comments">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/#comments</a>.</p>
<p>If you are one of those who use Tab Mix Plus <strong>and</strong> Wizz RSS, don&#8217;t worry, you haven&#8217;t gone crazy <img src='http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  There is some pretty serious weirdness when both add-ons are enabled.</p>
<p>Eric reported the problem in the <a href="http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=44220#44220">Tab Mix Plus support forum</a>, and onemen (one of the Tab Mix Plus developers I assume) has undertaken to sort out the problem on the Tab Mix Plus side. Thanks onemen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/09/incompatibility-with-tab-mix-plus-0385pre100907a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS 4.0 beta maxVersion bumped to 4.0b5</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who are using beta versions of Firefox 4, I have just put a version of Wizz RSS online that will install on 4.0b5. The scroll bar weirdness persists, but the latest news on Bugzilla ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584703 ) indicates that a fix has been landed for testing. Maybe 4.0b6 will include the fix. You can get Wizz RSS 4.0 here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who are using beta versions of Firefox 4, I have just put a version of Wizz RSS online that will install on 4.0b5.</p>
<p>The scroll bar weirdness persists, but the latest news on Bugzilla ( <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584703">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584703</a> ) indicates that a fix has been landed for testing. Maybe 4.0b6 will include the fix.</p>
<p>You can get Wizz RSS 4.0 <a href="http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/08/05/wizz-rss-40-beta-for-firefox-40b2/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/09/08/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wizz RSS 4.0 beta maxVersion bumped to 4.0b3</title>
		<link>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/08/12/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b3/</link>
		<comments>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/08/12/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wizz RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/08/12/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just updated the Wizz RSS 4.0 code so that it&#8217;ll install on Firefox 4.0b3. Apart from bumping maxVersion to 4.0b3, nothing else has changed. The vertical scroll bar bug in the item pane (XUL listbox widget) persists. I guess a bug fix wasn&#8217;t landed in time for the release of 4.0b3. Oh well&#8230; I assume it will get fixed at some time. If you have already installed Wizz RSS 4.0 for Firefox 4.0b2, and want to use it with Firefox 4.0b3, just reinstall it. You can get Wizz RSS 4.0 here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just updated the Wizz RSS 4.0 code so that it&#8217;ll install on Firefox 4.0b3. Apart from bumping maxVersion to 4.0b3, nothing else has changed.</p>
<p>The vertical scroll bar bug in the item pane (XUL listbox widget) persists. I guess a bug fix wasn&#8217;t landed in time for the release of 4.0b3. Oh well&#8230; I assume it will get fixed at some time.</p>
<p>If you have already installed Wizz RSS 4.0 for Firefox 4.0b2, and want to use it with Firefox 4.0b3, just reinstall it.</p>
<p>You can get Wizz RSS 4.0 <a href="http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/08/05/wizz-rss-40-beta-for-firefox-40b2/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizzrss.blat.co.za/2010/08/12/wizz-rss-40-beta-maxversion-bumped-to-40b3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

